Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Economy

Trump again asks N.Y. federal court to take over hush money case

NEW YORK — Donald Trump is making a second effort at getting his state court hush money case removed to federal court as his lawyers engage in aggressive efforts to get his sentencing postponed until after the November election.

In a filing Thursday evening, Trump attorneys Todd Blanche and Emil Bove argued that the former president and current GOP nominee is being harmed by actions taken by the state court judge who has overseen the New York case.

Trump was convicted in May of 34 counts of falsifying business records in connection with a hush money payment ahead of the 2016 election. He is scheduled to be sentenced on Sept. 18.

“The ongoing proceedings will continue to cause direct and irreparable harm to President Trump … and voters located far beyond Manhattan,” Blanche and Bove wrote.

Their filing cited a recent Supreme Court decision giving broad immunity to sitting presidents from actions that relate to official duties. While that ruling stemmed from a different criminal case against Trump, his legal team has since argued that a significant part of the Manhattan district attorney’s hush money case relied on evidence and testimony connected to his first year in the White House.

“The U.S. Supreme Court recently ruled that these types of violations threaten the structure of the federal government and the ability of future Presidents to carry out their vital duties in the way the Framers intended,” the filing said.

U.S. District Court Judge Alvin Hellerstein rejected Trump’s initial removal efforts last year, concluding that Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg’s felony case was being properly handled in New York state court and was not connected to the former president’s official duties while in office.

If Hellerstein agrees to hear arguments on the new filing, it could affect the timeline of proceedings in state court.

New York Supreme Court Justice Juan Merchan is expected to rule soon on a request from Trump’s lawyers to postpone his sentencing until after the Nov. 5 election. Merchan is also scheduled to decide on Sept. 16 if the presidential immunity doctrine should have any bearing on Trump’s conviction.

This post appeared first on washingtonpost.com
Enter Your Information Below To Receive Free Trading Ideas, Latest News And Articles.

    Your information is secure and your privacy is protected. By opting in you agree to receive emails from us. Remember that you can opt-out any time, we hate spam too!

    You May Also Like

    Editor's Pick

    On April 23, 1985, the Coca-Cola Company made one of the biggest mistakes in American business history: it changed the formula for Coca-Cola. Outraged...

    Editor's Pick

    For years the North Korean playbook was obvious to the world. The Democratic People’s Republic of Korea wanted to be the center of attention....

    Editor's Pick

    The final December results from the University of Michigan Surveys of Consumers show overall consumer sentiment improved for the month but remains near historically...

    Editor's Pick

    New orders for durable goods fell 2.1 percent in November, following a 0.7 percent gain in October. Total durable-goods orders are up 10.6 percent...